Ofcom issues an enforcement action or formal infringement finding against X regarding the Grok chatbot.

• G
  GeminiGoogle

  Enforcement hinges on Ofcom finding Grok systematically failed Online Safety Act duty-of-care curbs on illegal harms before April 2027.

  • Ofcom already narrowed the probe to illegal content, typically the final procedural phase before statutory infringement notices.
  • The 6-month remaining window fits Ofcom's standard 12-to-18 month major probe cycle, making a published finding highly probable.
  • A voluntary binding settlement without a formal infringement ruling is the primary outcome that would prevent resolution.

  google/gemini-3.8-flash · asked 14 Oct 2026
  68%
• G
  GrokxAI

  Ofcom must publish a statutory finding or sanction on Grok illegal-content access by April 2027.

  • Ofcom already narrowed the live OSA probe; a published decision typically follows 4–9 months after that stage.
  • X’s prior child-safety and illegal-content clashes with Ofcom raise the odds above the ~40% historic close-without-finding rate.
  • A quiet settlement or Grok access-control fix before year-end would most lower the chance.

  x-ai/grok-4.6 · asked 14 Oct 2026
  58%
• Q
  QwenAlibaba

  Ofcom's enforcement pipeline is slow; six months is tight for a formal finding even with a narrowed probe.

  • Ofcom's Online Safety Act enforcement process requires preliminary findings, a representations period, and a final decision—rarely completed in under 9 months from…
  • X has strong incentive to remediate Grok's content filters before a formal sanction lands, and Ofcom historically prefers compliance over public enforcement.
  • A leaked preliminary finding or political escalation (e.g., a high-profile Grok harm incident) would push this above 60; absent that, the default path is extended…

  qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902 · asked 14 Oct 2026
  39%
• G
  GPTOpenAI

  It hinges on Ofcom obtaining evidence that X breached its illegal-content duties and choosing a public notice over closure or undertakings.

  • Ofcom must complete the narrowed probe, satisfy its statutory threshold, and issue a published decision within roughly six months.
  • Online-safety investigations commonly end without a penalty after remediation; formal findings are slower and comparatively uncommon.
  • A documented failure by Grok to block UK access to priority illegal content, especially after Ofcom requests evidence, would raise the odds sharply.

  openai/gpt-5.6-terra · asked 14 Oct 2026
  37%
• C
  ClaudeAnthropic

  Hinges on whether Ofcom's narrowed probe into Grok's illegal content access reaches a formal decision before April 2027.

  • Ofcom investigations typically take 12-24+ months from open to published enforcement decision, and this one is already underway with a narrowed scope.
  • Ofcom has shown willingness to escalate against major platforms (e.g. Grindr, TikTok fines), suggesting above-average follow-through once scope narrows.
  • X could settle, remediate, or Ofcom could close without formal finding if cooperation is sufficient, which would resolve this false.

  anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 · asked 14 Oct 2026
  28%
• D
  DeepSeekDeepSeek

  Ofcom's Online Safety Act powers only bite once illegal-content duties were live, and a formal sanction needs a completed probe plus representations.

  • Ofcom opened the Grok probe in early 2026 and narrowed it to illegal-content access, but OSA illegal-content duties for search and user-to-user services only commenced…
  • The process requires Ofcom to issue a provisional breach view, take written and oral representations, then publish a final decision; comparable OSA cases have taken…
  • Precedent: Ofcom's first OSA enforcement actions (against a smaller site, 2025) took roughly a year, and X has litigated every prior regulatory step, so a binding…

  deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash · asked 14 Oct 2026
  22%

6 of 6 models answered · 46 points between the highest and lowest. None was shown the market price.